Documents Archive for Cocaine Anonymous

For the most up-to-date online repository of C.A. World Conference, WBST and WSOB Minutes

Menu
  • Home
  • The Archive Site Map
  • History of C.A.
Menu

Sep 3, 2006 – Day 6, Summary of Motions – Public Information Closing Report

Posted on September 3, 2006November 27, 2022 by caws.archivist

CLOSING REPORT

C.A. WORLD SERVICE CONFERENCE 2006

Public Information REPORT

INTRODUCTION AND OPENING COMMENTS

PI has a very passionate and dynamic committee this year. Several new members joined this committee, many from locations outside the United States. We did a lot of work this year. New materials and new ideas were brought fourth to help make our PI tools better reflect our international diversity.

All of our committee members gave 110% to this committee. Two of our members spent a day at CAWSO compiling our existing PI materials and creating a power point presentation to help the fellowship better understand what tools are already available to them from CAWSO. Several members spent time revamping both our Fact File and our Membership Survey form. Housekeeping on our manual was also done.

Page 1 of 23

Gerald Collard – Chairperson – Quebec
Ruby Lemoine – Secretary – UT
Jackie Schickler – Trustee – London
Bruce Watson – Vice Chair – MA
Brent Payne – S. Cal
Susan Bredau – S. Cal
Susan (Sue) Bowers – S. Alberta
Steve Spence – S. Cal
Robert Bohman – Sweden
Darryl Johnson – MO
Debra Verice – LA

David Oakland – TX
Marty Douglas – UT
Russell Sedman – London
Lawrence Matlock – AR
Ethel Thomas – S. Cal
Karen Donovan – NM
Stacy Keyes-Weston – S. Cal
Tad Smith – KS
Amanda McCubbin – BC
Deidre McKinney – S. Cal
Vinny Martin – N. Cal

Page 2 of 23

COMMITTEE WORK THAT RESULTED IN MOTIONS

A lot of work was put into making the Membership Survey better reflect our international diversity.

Motion – To have the 2007-2008 Membership Survey accepted for distribution to the Fellowship during our next survey.

Second.

Chair – would like to speak to motion.

Stacey Keyes-Weston – wanted to add a more international flavor. More understandable to international fellows.

Kathy Jo Rangno – Friendly amendment to revised the zip code to 90034.

Stacey Keyes-Weston- housekeeping

Bryan Seid – Point of Information – Broken up the steps in different order – what is the meaning of separating that way?

Stacey Keyes-Weston – that is the way I worked them.

Waheedah Muhammed – Point of Information – will this be made available on line.

Stacey Keyes-Weston – spoke with IT and it is possible. I would be willing to assist. Yes.

Karyn Layns – Friendly amendment – “How did you use Cocaine?” Add all “other mind altering substances”

Stacey Keyes-Weston – new version has line that asks “How did you use?

Karyn Layns – can I ask a question?

Chair – No

Greg Baron – Point of Information – was there a reason for ethnicity to be inconsistent – African American, etc. but not Asian American, etc.?

Stacey Keyes-Weston – took great pains to be politically correct. We aren’t talking about ancestry, we are talking about ethnicity. If a black man is from Canada, he is welcome to check “Other.” Used politically correct terms.

Page 3 of 23

Rick Delgado – now that we should be thinking outside the box, will it be produced in other languages?

Stacey Keyes-Weston – if we can make it available translated, we will be more than happy to do so.

David Crosland – tried hard with ethnicity, but if I was a black British person, I would feel slighted. Speaking against the motion.

Barry Haynes – friendly amendment – Subject “What steps have you worked …” Keep original language of the survey, include “all” at the end of the language.

Stacey Keyes-Weston – request for conference with committee.   Not accepted.

Willie Bailey – speak in favor of the motion.

Bryan Seid – Friendly amendment under “What steps are you working on?” Add “either”

Bruce Watson –

Cynthia Cronkhite – Point of Order – proper response – Yes or no

Bruce Watson – NO

Bryan Bell – Looking at form as how I would fill out and to be honest, I would be confused as to whether I was a Caucasian European, etc. or other. Our European population would skyrocket which would give ineffective data. Would the committee be willing to make a friendly amendment?

Cynthia Cronkhite – Point of Information – understand there were some challenges with tabulations of last survey. Is the committee working with the office.

Jackie Schickler – results will go to the office and we will have two copies of the results in the process.

Barry Haynes – speaks against the motion worded. Several European delegates on committee, concerns of the floor were not addressed. What steps are you working on question is not clearly defined as the program of recovery.

Page 4 of 23

Willie Bailey – Call to question.

Second.

Chair – motion not debatable.

Motion to close debate passed with 2/3 majority.

Main motion passes 60 to 35.

Ester Bowen – 5th Concept Statement – concerned the reason European Caucasian ethic question

Stacey Keyes-Weston – the committee is always willing to work with the fellowship. Just get your questions to us. We did a lot of footwork on this issue and we will look at it again.

Calvin Chalmers – 5th Concept Statement – the steps were designed, understand completely, they were worked together. This was the way

Felicia Adams – Parliamentary Inquiry

Chair – Calvin you are out of order.

Matt Tepoorten – 5th concept statement – voted against. Not a bad survey , just a lot of inconsistencies. How the steps are grouped together. I didn’t work the steps like that. If I come in and I write down 6 months clean time – do I write 6 months or 6-9 months. Just little inconsistencies that can be worked out and we can still get out for the next survey.

Chair – could consider motion to refer back to committee in thefuture.

* * * * *

(Show 2 business cards on screen)

Motion – To accept these two business card templates as approved CAWS PI materials.

Second

Page 5 of 23

Bryan Seid – Point of Order – I didn’t get this in handout and can’t verify the validity of the information on the Powerpoint.

Vinny Martin – Parliamentary Inquiry

Chair – let us resolve the Point of Order. The current version of Standing Rule #11, main motion shall be displayed at the front. Motion have to be in writing.

Vinny Martin – Parliamentary Inquiry – requesting B&W copies of this information.

Chair – come back at 9:30 prepared to look at the material.

REFERRALS THAT RESULTED IN MOTIONS

(Show 2 business cards on screen)

Motion: To accept these two business card templates as approved CAWS PI materials. Second.

Chair – any debate

Nicholas Lynn – Point of Information – should you explain if this is not a drug specific fellowship, why the terminology.

Susan Bredau – which card?

Nicholas Lynn – Card #2 – not a drug specific fellowship

Susan Bredau – language directly from pamphlet.

Jackie Schickler – speaks in favor of the motion. Language is already conference approved. Just want to develop card to leave around, an additional resource.

Carl Warlick – speak in favor of motion. We were at Health Fair recently. We had some of these cards and they were passed out there. Very helpful. We do have a singleness of purpose, but not substance.

Yves White – Point of Information – the back – really centered on California

Susan Bredau – the back isn’t being considered for approval. Just the front. Just an example. Templates are able to be enlarged.

Kathy Jo Rangno – Friendly amendment – & should be spelled. Housekeeping.

Chair – no further debate.

Motion carries unanimously.

Referral 4863

“That the PI Committee develop a 25th CA Anniversary press kit to be made available for distribution to the media at the discretion of the WSPI Committee, the WSBT, the WSOB and local CA Areas and PI Chairs.”

Page 6 of 23

Motion – For this Conference to approve the concept of creating 25th Anniversary materials to foster awareness of the history of CA and its growth internationally.

Second.

Chair – any debate?

Motion passes unanimously.

* * * * *

Referral 4912

“I ask that the PI committee consider including the CA UK PI artwork in the PI workbook. Even if local PI’s wish to change specific wording on the artwork, we can still encourage a unified design (green background, white font). We (PI) should wherever possible be sure that our posters/artwork are not drug specific and/or exclusive, I believe the current poster to be both (‘current’ meaning the poster in the WSO PI workbook and not the submitted artwork) (which is attached).

And

Referral 4593 (2005 post Conference)

“To be provided with generic public information that has been tailored to the international community at large, i.e. posters without U.S. help lines, but space for local help lines to be written in as well as blank space for international web address.”

Motion – To accept the green folder and the flyer templates created by the UK as approved CAWS PI materials.

Second.

Russell Sedman – speaks to motion. Started as idea in UK. Looking for theme/design that we could use. Green background with white font. Attending conference regularly. Good to have to represent professionally. Showed display of folder.

Nicholas Lynn – Point of Information -Tradition #3 – Cocaine and… This reads “or other”

Page 7 of 23

Russell Sedman – we discussed at length. If we start wording like that, we may be excluding addicts who don’t understand necessity of total abstinence.

Dan Santa Maria – Point of Information – on Page 8 of handout, footnote – reprinted from pamphlet “To the Newcomer”.

Jackie Schickler – got information from Ms. Patty but will double check

Felicia Adams – Point of Information – what is the language on Page 3? What are the other languages?

Russell Sedman – #3 – Swedish, #4 – Dutch, #5 – French.

Nick Alexander – Point of Information – in Referral #4912 – “artwork is not drug specific.” Wondered why Cocaine is so much larger?

Tad Smith – these are examples of flyers, posters, billboards. You can manipulate anyway you want. We are specifically requesting they be in Green and White. Wording is controlled by Areas, etc.

Chair – why are we conferencing approving something that you can change anyway you want?

Vinny Martin – we are requesting that they look similarily. Can make at local level, just wont’ be Conference approved.

Scott Keaveny – speaks in favor of motion. Very eye-catching. Opportunity to carry a wealth of information that you can provide at one shot.

Willie Bailey – speaks in favor of the motion. Committee did a lot of work and we can tweak all we want. Why not approve the spirit of the motion?

Ed Majors – Friendly amendment – Page 6 – “Cocaine and all other mind altering substances”

Vinny Martin – No

Gloria Bridget – Point of Information – Conference approved and then mention of whatever the Area wants to do – not to be duplicated without trademark

Vinny Martin – you can get from the Office. District/Areas can create their own flyers but they will no longer be conference approved.

Page 8 of 23

Barry Haynes – call to question.

Second. Passes.

Motion passes with substantial unanimity.

Nick Alexander – Parliamentary Inquiry – if no one debated against the motion, we called to question without hearing opposition.

Chair – that would have been valid to discuss prior to vote.

* * * * *

Referral 4978

“Could you please explore the possibility of creating new PSAs that would reach out to a more diverse (and all mind altering substances) and ethnic community.”

Motion – For this Conference to approve the concept for the PI Committee to develop an international video PSA.”

Second.

Chair – like to speak to motion.

Vinny Martin – this has been coming up in committee for years now. After long debates, who better to create than PI committee.

Cynthia Cronkhite – Friendly amendment – 8 pt approve

Vinny Martin – next motion.

Yves White – Point of Information – international video – what is the intent?

Jackie Schickler – we are requesting approval of the concept. Once that happens we will worry about other issues. Speaks in favor of the motion, the committee for many years to create more materials, to be more diverse, to reach out into different sectors. What exactly is our statement of purpose? We are about Public Information. Very talented individuals on large committee. PI statement purpose read. Started to wonder about what it means to develop. We are asking the conference to allow us to look into the concept.

Roy Mullins – speaks against the motion. This would take away monies from Translations. It would be more effective to reach people in that way.

Page 9 of 23

Joan Johnson – Point of Information – diverse and ethnic community – international PSA from the motion. Are we talking about everywhere or just overseas.

Vinny Martin – everywhere.

Greg Baron – speaks in favor of the motion. Perfect fit for PI. Have seen all the videos and none address the issue of ethnic diversity, let alone the international issue, various languages and cultures. Time is right to start working on this.

Willie Bailey – speak in favor of the motion. It’s a concept. If we approve the concept, questions can go to the committee to formulate ideas.

Bobbie Harmon – speaks in favor of the motion. What comes to mind – “This is your Brain…” A PSA got my attention out there.

Khalid King – speaks in favor of the motion. Appreciate international and ethnicity diversity.

Waheedah Muhammad – call for the vote. Second.

Chair – not debatable. 2/3 majority. Passes unanimously.

Motion passes with minor opposition with substantial unanimity.

If the above stated motion passes, then . . .

Page 10 of 23

Motion – For this Conference to approve a 68-point approval process to develop an international video PSA.

  1. Idea/Script/Storyboard
  2. Review by WSOB
  3. Approval of Script/Storyboard & budget by the conference
  4. Preproduction
  5. Review by Trustees
  6. Production/Edit
  7. Review by Trustees
  8. Approval by conference floor

Second.

Vinny Martin – this motion is not what we are going to do, who’s going to be acting. Just to get the 6-point process approved.

Cynthia Cronkhite – Friendly amendment – change to approve and 8 point approval process to insert new 2. and 5.

Vinny martin – Accept.

To get the Office involved as soon as possible. Two reviews by the Trustees before any funds are expended on the process. Seems most fiscally responsible to have the reviews prior to spending.

John Bodkin – Point of Information – long overdue. Is there a feeling as to how soon the concept will begin to produce results and what year’s budget it may impact?

Felicia Adams – Parliamentary Inquiry – originally a motion, friendly amendment

Chair – the friendly was accepted.

John Bodkin – what is the vision of the overall execution?

Jackie Schickler – within our existing budget, we can develop the idea/script/storyboard. We don’t about the rest yet. Very dedicated and talented individuals on committee. Believe we can do it for smallest amount in the highest quality.

Vinny Martin – keeping costs down is big factor.

Scott Botz –

Motion – For this Conference to approve a 68-point approval process to develop an international video PSA.

  1. Idea/Script/Storyboard

Page 11 of 23

  1. Review by WSOB
  2. Approval of Script/Storyboard & budget by the conference
  3. Preproduction
  4. Review by Trustees
  5. Production/Edit
  6. Review by Trustees
  7. Approval by conference floor

Scott Botz -Please take out word “international”

Jackie Schickler – international also includes the US.

Chair – could it be not limited to international and not limit to any other work in the future.

Vinny Martin – No, don’t accept.

Matt Teeporten – Point of Information – when we did previous videos, didn’t we have a process in place?

Jackie Schickler – PI doesn’t have an approval process. We have looked historically for one and don’t seem to have one. Took initiative to create one.

Nicholas Lynn – did the committee leave out which language?

Vinny Martin – there may be no narrative.

John Bodkin – procedures are funny. We don’t want to impede the process. Approval of the budget by the conference. If we are well underway with the concept that we are ready to go to production, but we are relying onconference to approve budget, meeting only once a year, does this impede the process?

Vinny Martin – potentially.

Willie Bailey – call to question. Second. Passes

Motion passes unanimously.

* * * * *

Referral 4913.

“It is my experience that many addicts and non-addicts alike understand Cocaine Anonymous to be exclusively for cocaine addicts. I ask that “all other mind altering substances . . . “ be added to the WSPI Workbook on Page 9, suggested material/literature.”

Page 12 of 23

Motion – To add the pamphlet title “. . . And All Other Mind Altering Substances” to the CAWS PI Workbook, Page 9, subsection ‘Suggested Material.’

Second.

Bryan Seid – Point of Order – since this is already approved literature, can the chair just have added.

Chair – no

Ethel Thomas – already approved literature.

Cynthia Cronkhite – Point of Information – what other literature is listed in the PI Workbook? Someone just handed to me.

Nick Alexander – Point of Information – pamphlet available online. Would it become a discounted price on order form available through theoffice.

Ethel Thomas – available under chips & literature.

John Bodkin – depending on outcome. It would be made available with other PI materials and appropriate amendments could be made then.

Willie Bailey – speaks in favor of the motion. Once again, they have submitted an idea and we try to recreate their motion.

Alonzo Mitchell – call to question.

Chair – ruled out of order

Motion carries unanimously.

REFERRALS OR ITEMS TABLED UNTIL NEXT YEAR; AND ITEMS THE COMMITTEE WILL CONTINUE WORKING ON THROUGH THE YEAR

Referral 5139

“That the committee consider electing/appointing a liaison to the IT and Archives (and other appropriate) committees to facilitate the needs of the PI committee as needed. Thank you!”

This referral will be worked on through the year.

* * * * *

Housekeeping will continue on the PI workbook with our goal being to submit an updated workbook for distribution in the post conference delegate mailing.

Page 13 of 23

In the absence of new/current data to put in the Fact File, this document is being given a ‘face-lift’ so it will better present the data we do have.

We will work on a statement encouraging the use of the “green background/white font” idea to help promote uniformity throughout the world in our visual PSA presentations.

Page 14 of 23

REFERRALS OR ITEMS REFERRED TO OTHER COMMITTEES; WORLD SERVICE OFFICE, OR BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Referral 4914

“Would it be possible to have a PI e-mail group ‘open’ to anyone wishing to check out local PI ideas and to seek guidance and expertise? This could be accessed through our website. This e-mail group would be available to PI’s who don’t serve on WS PI.”

This referral was transferred to the IT Committee.

REFERRALS THAT DID NOT RESULT IN MOTIONS

Referral 4865

“That the PI Committee implements a new section of the PI workbook for Pass-it-ons, whereby the process of successful PI endeavors may be outlined. This will become especially important to understand how PI work is accomplished internationally.”

This referral is beyond the scope of what the PI Workbook is intended to provide.

* * * * *

Referral 4587 (2005 Post Conference)

“Can the PI Committee modify or re-examine their scope to be broadened to include the ability of sending out letter, etc. on a national scale, i.e. official letter form CAWSO PI to SAMSH and/or other NATIONAL DRUG POLICY, DRUG ORGANIZATIONS.”

Response – This is not within the scope of the CAWS PI Committee. We are an international committee with budget restraints. Letters of this nature are left to the discretion of local areas. We would be happy to entertain a suggested letter from the maker of this referral for consideration in the PI workbook.    

* * * * *

Page 15 of 23

Referral 4625 (2005 Post Conference)

Would the PI committee consider a contact sheet that includes the area PI chairs information and then contact that chair one time a year to help them understand and be knowledgeable of the resources available in the PI work book and how to use them.

Response – A “Public Information Contact Sheet for Areas & Districts” is ready for distribution to the fellowship.

* * * * *

Page 16 of 23

Referral 4866

“That PI urge the Conference to adopt a new slogan “Recovery from Addiction since 1982.”

Response – There was no meeting of the minds on this referral so it was agreed that no action would be taken on this referral. The maker of this referral is part of the PI Committee and has agreed to this response.

NEW COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AS OF THIS CONFERENCE

Chair – Gerald Collard, Quebec

Vice-Chair – Vinny Martin, N. Cal

Secretary – Ruby Lemoine, UT

CLOSING COMMENTS

In order to be more of service to the CA fellowship throughout the world, steps will be taken to make it easier to download and then modify CAWS approved PI materials. We are strongly encouraging the use of the green background/white font to create uniformity in the visual image of CA around the world. In the absence of new/current data to put in the Fact File, this document is being given a ‘face-lift’ so it will better present the data we do have. Please encourage your Area/District PI Chairs to complete and return the ‘Public Information Contact Sheet for Areas & Districts.’

PUBLIC INFORMATION – We DO have the ability to reach out and touch the world with information about Cocaine Anonymous.

Respectfully Submitted:

Gerald Collard, CAWS PI Chairperson

Chair – questions for committee?

Barry Haynes – since we have adopted membership survey, when will we receive?

Stacey Keyes-Weston – will be in delegate mailing.

Howard Eley – regarding video – what is the criteria to be included?

Page 17 of 23

Jackie Schickler – all we have approved is the concept. In the process, we will get to committee and let you know.

Kelley Colvin – how the Online service area help you all reach out and touch the World?

Benjamin Shuler – timeline on PSA?

Jackie Schickler – No

Calvin Chalmers – wasn’t sure what I was voting on? Is it the same thing as the English copy?

Jackie Schickler – we have been assured by members from other countries that it is.

Chair – please join me in thanking committee for their hard work. Will be taking a break for officer elections. Please be back in 10 minutes.

***Break***

Page 18 of 23

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CA DIGITAL REPOSITORY

Breadcrumb Navigation

Documents Archive for Cocaine Anonymous/ All Documents/ WS Conferences/ 2006 WS Conference/ 2006 Closing Reports/ Sep 3, 2006 – Day 6, Summary of Motions – Public Information Closing Report

Documents Categories

  • Standing Committee Guidelines & Manuals
    • Archive Committee
    • Conference Committee
    • Convention Committee
    • Finance Committee
    • Hospitals & Institutions
    • IT Committee
    • Literature, Chips and Formats Committee
    • Public Information Committee
    • Structure and Bylaws Committee
    • Unity Committee
    • World Service Manual (WSM)
  • WS Conferences
    • 1986 First WS Conference February
    • 1986 Second WS Conference July
    • 1987 WS Conference March
    • 1987 WS Conference November
    • 1988 WS Conference
    • 1989 WS Conference
    • 1990 WS Conference
    • 1991 WS Conference
    • 1992 WS Conference
    • 1993 WS Conference
    • 1994 WS Conference
    • 1995 WS Conference
    • 1996 WS Conference
    • 1997 WS Conference
    • 1998 WS Conference
    • 1999 WS Conference
    • 2000 WS Conference
      • 2000 Closing Reports
      • 2000 Opening Reports
    • 2001 WS Conference
      • 2001 Closing Report
      • 2001 Opening Reports
    • 2002 WS Conference
    • 2003 WS Conference
      • 2003 Closing Reports
      • 2003 Opening Reports
    • 2004 WS Conference
      • 2004 Closing Reports
      • 2004 Opening Reports
    • 2005 WS Conference
      • 2005 Closing Reports
      • 2005 Opening Reports
    • 2006 WS Conference
      • 2006 Closing Reports
      • 2006 Opening Reports
    • 2007 WS Conference
      • 2007 Closing Reports
      • 2007 Opening Reports
    • 2008 WS Conference
      • 2008 Closing Reports
      • 2008 Opening Reports
    • 2009 WS Conference
      • 2009 Closing Reports
      • 2009 Opening Reports
    • 2010 WS Conference
      • 2010 Closing Report
      • 2010 Opening Reports
    • 2011 WS Conference
      • 2011 Closing Reports
      • 2011 Opening Reports
    • 2012 WS Conference
      • 2012 Closing Reports
      • 2012 Opening Reports
    • 2013 WS Conference
      • 2013 Closing Report
      • 2013 Opening Reports
    • 2014 WS Conference
      • 2014 Closing Reports
      • 2014 Opening Reports
    • 2015 WS Conference
      • 2015 Closing Reports
      • 2015 Opening Reports
    • 2016 WS Conference
      • 2016 Closing Reports
      • 2016 Opening Reports
    • 2017 WS Conference
      • 2017 Closing Reports
      • 2017 Opening Reports
    • 2018 WS Conference
      • 2018 Closing Reports
      • 2018 Opening Reports
    • 2019 WS Conference
      • 2019 Closing Reports
      • 2019 Opening Reports
    • 2021 WS Conference
      • 2021 Closing Reports
      • 2021 Opening Reports
    • 2022 WS Conference
      • 2022 WSC Minutes
      • 2022 WSC Reports
    • 2023 WS Conference
      • 2023 WSC Minutes
      • 2023 WSC Reports
    • 2024 WS Conference
      • 2024 WSC Day 1
      • 2024 WSC Day 2
      • 2024 WSC Day 3
    • 2025 WS Conference
      • 2025 WSC Day 1
      • 2025 WSC Day 2
      • 2025 WSC Day 3
      • 2025 WSC Day 4
  • WSBT
    • 1986 WSBT
    • 1987 WSBT
    • 1988 WBST
    • 1989 WSBT
    • 1990 WSBT
    • 1991 WSBT
    • 1992 WSBT
    • 1993 WSBT
    • 1994 WSBT
    • 1995 WSBT
    • 1996 WSBT
    • 1997 WSBT
    • 1998 WSBT
    • 1999 WSBT
    • 2000 WSBT
    • 2001 WSBT
    • 2002 WSBT
    • 2003 WSBT
    • 2004 WSBT
    • 2005 WSBT
    • 2006 WSBT
    • 2007 WSBT
    • 2008 WSBT
    • 2009 WSBT
    • 2010 WSBT
    • 2011 WSBT
    • 2012 WSBT
    • 2013 WSBT
    • 2014 WSBT
    • 2015 WSBT
    • 2016 WSBT
    • 2017 WSBT
    • 2018 WSBT
    • 2019 WSBT
    • 2020 WSBT
    • 2021 WSBT
    • 2022 WSBT
    • 2023 WSBT
    • 2024 WSBT
    • 2025 WSBT
    • 2026 WSBT
  • WSOB
    • 1983 GSB
    • 1984 GSB
    • 1985 WSOB
    • 1986 WSOB
    • 1987 WSOB
    • 1988 WSOB
    • 1989 WSOB
    • 1990 WSOB
    • 1991 WSOB
    • 1992 WSOB
    • 1993 WSOB
    • 1994 WSOB
    • 1995 WSOB
    • 1996 WSOB
    • 1997 WSOB
    • 1998 WSOB
    • 1999 WSOB
    • 2000 WSOB
    • 2001 WSOB
    • 2002 WSOB
    • 2003 WSOB
    • 2004 WSOB
    • 2005 WSOB
    • 2006 WSOB
    • 2007 WSOB
    • 2008 WSOB
    • 2009 WSOB
    • 2010 WSOB
    • 2011 WSOB
    • 2012 WSOB
    • 2013 WSOB
    • 2014 WSOB
    • 2015 WSOB
    • 2016 WSOB
    • 2017 WSOB
    • 2018 WSOB
    • 2019 WSOB
    • 2020 WSOB
    • 2021 WSOB
    • 2022 WSOB
    • 2023 WSOB
    • 2024 WSOB
    • 2025 WSOB
    • 2026 WSOB

We’re looking for the following WSBT and WSOB Minutes:

WSBT Quarterly Missing Minutes

2003 – Feb. 2

WSOB Missing Minutes

1983 – Jan. – April, May, June, Aug. 16, Sept. – Oct.
1984 – Sept. 27, Oct, Nov
1985 – Jan. 16 – May 23
1985 – July 25 (missing page 2)
1988 – June 9
1990 – Jan. 18, July, Aug, Sept, Oct.
1992 – May 14, June 24 (missing page 3?)
1993 – Jan. 28, Feb. 25, Apr. 8, April 22, June, July, Aug. 26, Sept., Oct. 14, Nov. 11.
1995 Dec. 14 (missing page 4)
2005 – Nov.
2018 – May

Use this digital repository site for the most up-to-date a reliable history of Cocaine Anonymous. This site is hosted by the C.A. Service Sponsorship Group, which is a member of the C.A. Online Recovery Area and curated by Cocaine Anonymous Archivist, Cameron F. who has been involved in collecting, preserving, cataloguing and presenting the history of Cocaine Anonymous to the fellowship since 2009. Cameron F. is currently the C.A. Archivist and Secretary for C.A. World Archive Committee, Southern Ontario C.A. Area Archivist, Online International Area (formerly the OSA) Archivist and the Online Recovery Area Archivist.

The Archivist’s Serenity Prayer

“God, grant me the serenity to accept the collections I cannot decline… the courage to decline the collections I can… And the resources to process the backlog.”

Site Disclaimer

© 2026 C.A. DOCUMENTS Digital Library. Conference, WSBT and WSOB Minutes are C.A. documents, for members only. This usage to facilitate communication within the fellowship was approved by the 1990 WS Conference. Such confidential use does not , of course, violate in anyway out Tradition on anonymity in public communications media (press, radio, TV, etc).

© 2026 Cocaine Anonymous is a Fellowship of, by, and for addicts seeking recovery. Friends and Family of addicts should contact Co-Anon Family Groups, a Fellowship dedicated to their much different needs. Some of the items contained in these pages are published with permission of C.A. World Service, but this does not imply endorsement of this website by the C.A. World Service Conference or the C.A. World Service Office. The information provided within this website is intended to be a convenience for those who visit our website. Such inclusion does not constitute or imply endorsement by, or affiliation with, the Area or the Districts within. “Cocaine Anonymous World Service Conference Approved Literature. Copyright © 2026 Cocaine Anonymous World Service, “C.A.”, “Cocaine Anonymous” and the C.A. logo are registered trademarks of Cocaine Anonymous World Service. All rights reserved.” “In the spirit of Tradition Six, C.A. is not allied with any sect, denomination, politics, organization or institution. As such in the Area, District, Service Committees of Cocaine Anonymous and Cocaine Anonymous as a whole does not endorse and is not affiliated with or any of the companies and/or services offered on the site. Any links to external websites or services are only provided as a convenience to our members.”

C.A. Speaker Recordings: All members are free to interpret the recovery program in their own terms, but none can speak for the local Group or C.A. as a whole.
© 2026 Documents Archive for Cocaine Anonymous

I am a MEMBER of Cocaine Anonymous No, I'm NOT a Member of Cocaine Anonymous

Scroll Up