Documents Archive for Cocaine Anonymous

For the most up-to-date online repository of C.A. World Conference, WBST and WSOB Minutes

Menu
  • Home
  • The Archive Site Map
  • History of C.A.
Menu

Sep 2, 2005 – Day 4 – Daily Summary – TEC Closing Report

Posted on September 2, 2005November 27, 2022 by caws.archivist

TEC:

Jay Finesilver (TEC Chair) – Thanks to the 15 people who served.

Hayward Hunt is the new World Service Trustee.

Atlantic South Trustee position – No candidate was selected. The members of the WSBT will assume that position.

Questions:

Don Logan – How many candidates were there for the Atlantic South position?

Jay Finesilver – Three

Gloria Bridget – Our region suffered when a trustee was not elected. Is there no way that this can be re-hashed so as to elect a trustee?

Jay Finesilver – The process is clearly defined and followed, which was done. The result was that no one was selected.

Danny Holland – If you are not ratified at 2/3 then are you not to have one?

Jay – Correct.

Tammy Peacock – Would like to know the process to challenge the decision.

Kevin Murphy – The procedure is found in the Charter, item number 4.

Bob Campbell – Point of order – Charter item 4 does not apply. The TEC is not the “Board of Trustees and related activities”. The TEC is a separate, stand alone committee.

Kevin Murphy – Under item C.

Tammy Peacock – Would like to challenge the decision.

Motion to suspend the rules to hear an item of new business out of order.

Second.

Tigua Naghel – Point of order – Object to consideration of the questions.

Chair – Out of order.

Billy Humphries – Point of order.

Chair – A motion to suspend the rules will require a simple majority to pass.

Page 25 of 32 

Motion to suspend the rules fails 63 to 64.

Billy Humphries – Demands a recount.

Chair – The motion fails 61 to 64.

Tammy Peacock – 5th Concept statement.

John Whitaker – Parliamentary Inquiry – At which point would it be appropriate for the body to elect someone into that position?

Kevin Murphy – There is no direct procedure for WSC to elect members to the board of trustees unless pertains to part D in the Charter. It would be an item of new business on Sunday.

Bryan Bell – Should this decision remain standing as it is, would you confer with the WSBT to take into account that the region needs a Trustee who is accessible and be as close as possible to the Atlantic South.

Jay Finesilver – See page 4.7.

Billy Humphries – Point of order.

Chair – out of order.

Teri Knight – The Trustee at Large position holder, Bobbie Harmon, will be representing the concerns to the Atlantic South Region until another slate can be reviewed and a trustee elected.

John Bodkin – Parliamentary Inquiry – Would the outcome of the Conference attempting to take action on article 4 of the Conference Charter create the need to potentially debate a candidate on the floor with no resume and no interview?

Kevin Murphy – Yes, it would be an open debate.

Tony Drake – Point of Order – If we are going to have an open discussion, we are not supposed to be personally punitive.

Kevin Murphy – Correct.

Freeman Houston – 5th Concept statement.

David McQuiag – 5th Concept Statement.

Tad Smith – Question.

Tammy Peacock – Parliamentary Inquiry – Can I make a motion to suspend the rules to make a special election out of order?

Page 26 of 32 

Chair – Can’t make the same motion twice and this is the same motion.

Tammy Peacock – Challenge the chair.

Cynthia Cronkhite – Was there a second?

Kevin Murphy – Yes, there was a second. This is not debatable. If you agree with the chair that this is the same motion, you will vote to sustain the chair. If you feel this motion should be allowed as requested, then you vote to overturn the chair.

Kevin Murphy – The motion to sustain the chair passes. The Chair’s ruling is sustained.  

Bryan Seid – Are you (TEC) going to modify the TEC process so that things like this will not happen in the future on their own or should I make a referral?

Jay Finesilver – This was not about a lack of qualified candidates. We did not reach unanimity. We followed the process and we have adjourned.

Dan Santa Maria – Did the TEC explore the possibility of a candidate recusing themselves to assist in the process.

Jay Finesilver – We followed the process.

Shane Merck – 5th Concept statement.

Dan Santa Maria – Is it out of order for the Conference Chair to request the TEC to renew their efforts to achieve a solution.

Chair – I don’t have opinions on such issues.

Gloria Bridget – Parliamentary Inquiry – I asked if there was any way to get a Trustee for this Region and the answer was no.

Kevin Murphy – That was not the specific question asked previously.

Jim Schodowski – 5th Concept Statement.

Debra Virece – 5th Concept Statement. Not having a Trustee is a scary and disturbing proposition. I hope that changes will be made.

Bryan Seid – Motion to suspend the rules to hear a motion out of order. The motion would be to encourage the TEC to follow some guidelines to help them elect a trustee for the region out of the well qualified individuals.

Page 27 of 32 

Second

Chair – The motion is in order and there is no debate.

Chair – The motion to suspend the rules passed.

Bryan Seid – Motion for the TEC to use page 2.16 – “then draw the names from a hat and leave the choice to God”.

Jay Finesilver – Point of Order – that is for the Regional Slate

Scott Botz – Point of Order – The TEC has done their job and is no longer meeting so he believes this motion is out of order.

Chair – This motion has been ruled in order.

Susan Bredau – On page 2.16 it refers to 7 or more candidates.

Kevin Murphy – The motion is just using the language on page 2.1 as an example of a way to handle the situation. He is charging the TEC to simply go back and use a God box.

Danny Holland – Point of Order

Bryan Seid – Speaks in favor of the motion. Having experience with the TEC and knowing the candidates and if they are highly qualified, then this God hat process is the solution. Trust the process. The God hat is already a process in the Manual.

John Bodkin – Speaks against the motion. Rather than picking and choosing from different parts of the manual, we should use the process that is set forth in the manual. This is about substantial unanimity, not about qualified candidates. It is about the math. There might be a better solution, but this is not it. You can make a suggestion on how to make the process better with a referral.

Barry Haynes – Speaks in favor of the motion. I am aware of how financially fragile this fellowship is, and this process allows us the right to be wrong. This body has chosen to act and request getting a Regional Trustee. This is a simple process. Allow us the right to be wrong and correct our mistake.

Michael Chiki – Speaks in favor of the motion. We can save time, money and make people happy. If we can’t have someone in our Area, we would suffer. Let’s find a solution.

Jay Finesilver – Speaks against the motion. The process was 15 people and asked to select two Trustees. The process was long and involved. Bobbie Harmon is the Trustee that will cover that Region and she is very qualified to do this. Refers to Concept 9. A

Page 28 of 32 

group conscience is being ignored and this motion is flawed for that reason too.   A Trustee was elected with the God hat and was removed two years later, so this process was used previously. This process included a five hour debate. We picked another Trustee which shows this process works.

Tony Drake – Speaks against the motion. When we trusted the process with the God hat last time, the result was not great. That is a gamble. We believe that God speaks through the group conscience and this was seven group consciences. Now we are talking about God speaking through a hat? The process is in place and none of the candidates received the 2/3. We need to trust the conscience.

Vinney Martin – Speaks against the motion. There is a process. Although I believe it is ridiculous that three qualified nominees who were put on the slate and there is no Trustee elected, we should not be here discussing that. Rather, what we should be here debating here now is how to improve the process.

Bob Campbell – Speaks against the motion. I do trust the process. The process includes “if no one is chosen, the position remains open for the next year.” This Conference clearly approved this possibility. When the God hat was put into the process we went “oh boy, I hope we don’t have to use that”. The Conference took out the God hat and now we are looking to use it here. We took it out for a real reason. We had nightmarish problems. Insanity is continuing the same action and expecting a different result. This is not about them and us. They are on our side and we are on their side. Everything that people don’t like is Conference approved. This process has worked very well, most of the time.

Robert Holloway – Speaks in favor of the motion.

David McQuaig – Speaks in favor of the motion. Has heard: This was never about the qualifications; This is not about the qualifications of the TEC; The TEC did their job. This process doesn’t work all of the time and this may be one of the times that this did work. It doesn’t feel right to just “trust the process.”

Tammy Peacock – Speaks in favor of the motion. There may be problems, but the TEC is asked to bring certain recommendations to the floor. My question is…Is “trusting the process” leaving it alone or using the process to correct a mistake? We are trusting the process when we, the Conference floor, enters into debates such as these. This is trusting the process.

Teri Knight – Against the motion. This is the best solution to date on this issue. I don’t doubt that the candidates could serve in the future as a Trustee. It is a sound decision to have Bobbie Harmon cover the territory as the Trustee at Large. She already has strong footing in the region. I will be there as an elder statesmen to be supportive of the region. The process as it is currently defined should be supported. Following the group conscience and supporting the TEC is what we should do at this time.

Page 29 of 32 

John Whitaker – Call the question.

Second.

Motion passes with substantial unanimity.

Walter Johnson – Parliamentary Inquiry

Motion for the TEC to use page 2.16 – “then draw the names from a hat and leave the choice to God”. 

The motion fails: 34 for and 80 against.

Return to questions to the TEC.

Jim Schodowski – The make up of the TEC consists of how many Trustees and how many Delegates?

Jay Finesilver – 9 trustees and 6 delegates.

Scott Botz – How did the process work?

Jay Finesilver – The process in the manual was followed. The 2/3rd was done individually.

Billy Humphries – Motion to suspend the rules to take the vote to the conference floor. In order to hold an election.  

Tony Drake – Point of order.

Scott Botz – Point of order.

Chair – The motion is out of order.

Tad Smith – Did he Region lose the leadership of these three people because they were not elected?

David McQuaig – Is it appropriate to ask a rhetorical question?

Kevin Murphy – Yes.

Diane Wabitsch – 5th Concept Statement.

Tawri Bey – Is there a time limit on the TEC process?

Jay Finesilver – No there is no time limit. We went through the process and took as much time as it took.

Page 30 of 32 

Walker Johnson – 5th Concept Statement.

Bryan Seid – Motion to suspend the rules to extend the time of the session until the end of the TEC report. 

Second

Motion carries with substantial unanimity.

Bryan Seid – Motion to extend the time to hear the rest of the TEC report.

Second

Motion carries with substantial unanimity.

Tigua Naghel – Parliamentary Inquiry – How can I limit the questioning period of the TEC report?

Kevin Murphy – You can make a motion to suspend the rules to limit question.

Nick Alexander – Do you think the process is to blame for this and do you have any suggestion on how to make it better?

Jay Finesilver – The process worked well with one of the two Trustee elections this year and all three last year, so we know it works.

Cynthia Chronkhite – The process says that it ends after a certain number of ballots and that it is okay to end up without a Trustee. If someone does not like the process, they can make a referral to change it.

Freeman Houston – 5th Concept Statement.

Chair – Out of order. Has already expressed minority opinion.

Chair – The minority opinion has been adequately expressed. Please only ask questions.

Billy Humphries – 10th Concept.

Chair – can be worked on outside of this contact.

Felicia Adams – Is there more to the TEC report that we need to hear?

Chair – No, only questions.

Shane Merck – Have the questions asked in the interview process been revised or changed in the last ten years.

Page 31 of 32 

Jay Finesilver – Yes, last year and again this year.

John Bernardone – What can you do to encourage folks to want to do this sort of service with two Regions splitting.

Jay Finesilver – 7 out of 8 Trustees have been elected through this process. It works pretty damn well, most of the time.

Jim Schodowski – Are the trustees electing themselves?

Jay Finesilver – No. The process has been adjusted so that there is an equal balance of power.

David McQuiag – When the ballots occur, does every member have to vote yes or no, or can they abstain?

Jay Finesilver – They can abstain.

Bryan Seid – Should a referral be directed to the TEC or S&B?

Jay Finesilver – S&B.

Trever Scheible – Will a straight vote, one person one vote solve the problem in the future?

David McComb – Point of Order. Should this be directed to S&B?

Announcements

Dan Santa Maria – Motion to Adjourn the session. 

Second

Motion carries.

Page 32 of 32 

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CA DIGITAL REPOSITORY

Breadcrumb Navigation

Documents Archive for Cocaine Anonymous/ All Documents/ WS Conferences/ 2005 WS Conference/ 2005 Closing Reports/ Sep 2, 2005 – Day 4 – Daily Summary – TEC Closing Report

Documents Categories

  • Standing Committee Guidelines & Manuals
    • Archive Committee
    • Conference Committee
    • Convention Committee
    • Finance Committee
    • Hospitals & Institutions
    • IT Committee
    • Literature, Chips and Formats Committee
    • Public Information Committee
    • Structure and Bylaws Committee
    • Unity Committee
    • World Service Manual (WSM)
  • WS Conferences
    • 1986 First WS Conference February
    • 1986 Second WS Conference July
    • 1987 WS Conference March
    • 1987 WS Conference November
    • 1988 WS Conference
    • 1989 WS Conference
    • 1990 WS Conference
    • 1991 WS Conference
    • 1992 WS Conference
    • 1993 WS Conference
    • 1994 WS Conference
    • 1995 WS Conference
    • 1996 WS Conference
    • 1997 WS Conference
    • 1998 WS Conference
    • 1999 WS Conference
    • 2000 WS Conference
      • 2000 Closing Reports
      • 2000 Opening Reports
    • 2001 WS Conference
      • 2001 Closing Report
      • 2001 Opening Reports
    • 2002 WS Conference
    • 2003 WS Conference
      • 2003 Closing Reports
      • 2003 Opening Reports
    • 2004 WS Conference
      • 2004 Closing Reports
      • 2004 Opening Reports
    • 2005 WS Conference
      • 2005 Closing Reports
      • 2005 Opening Reports
    • 2006 WS Conference
      • 2006 Closing Reports
      • 2006 Opening Reports
    • 2007 WS Conference
      • 2007 Closing Reports
      • 2007 Opening Reports
    • 2008 WS Conference
      • 2008 Closing Reports
      • 2008 Opening Reports
    • 2009 WS Conference
      • 2009 Closing Reports
      • 2009 Opening Reports
    • 2010 WS Conference
      • 2010 Closing Report
      • 2010 Opening Reports
    • 2011 WS Conference
      • 2011 Closing Reports
      • 2011 Opening Reports
    • 2012 WS Conference
      • 2012 Closing Reports
      • 2012 Opening Reports
    • 2013 WS Conference
      • 2013 Closing Report
      • 2013 Opening Reports
    • 2014 WS Conference
      • 2014 Closing Reports
      • 2014 Opening Reports
    • 2015 WS Conference
      • 2015 Closing Reports
      • 2015 Opening Reports
    • 2016 WS Conference
      • 2016 Closing Reports
      • 2016 Opening Reports
    • 2017 WS Conference
      • 2017 Closing Reports
      • 2017 Opening Reports
    • 2018 WS Conference
      • 2018 Closing Reports
      • 2018 Opening Reports
    • 2019 WS Conference
      • 2019 Closing Reports
      • 2019 Opening Reports
    • 2021 WS Conference
      • 2021 Closing Reports
      • 2021 Opening Reports
    • 2022 WS Conference
      • 2022 WSC Minutes
      • 2022 WSC Reports
    • 2023 WS Conference
      • 2023 WSC Minutes
      • 2023 WSC Reports
    • 2024 WS Conference
      • 2024 WSC Day 1
      • 2024 WSC Day 2
      • 2024 WSC Day 3
    • 2025 WS Conference
      • 2025 WSC Day 1
      • 2025 WSC Day 2
      • 2025 WSC Day 3
      • 2025 WSC Day 4
  • WSBT
    • 1986 WSBT
    • 1987 WSBT
    • 1988 WBST
    • 1989 WSBT
    • 1990 WSBT
    • 1991 WSBT
    • 1992 WSBT
    • 1993 WSBT
    • 1994 WSBT
    • 1995 WSBT
    • 1996 WSBT
    • 1997 WSBT
    • 1998 WSBT
    • 1999 WSBT
    • 2000 WSBT
    • 2001 WSBT
    • 2002 WSBT
    • 2003 WSBT
    • 2004 WSBT
    • 2005 WSBT
    • 2006 WSBT
    • 2007 WSBT
    • 2008 WSBT
    • 2009 WSBT
    • 2010 WSBT
    • 2011 WSBT
    • 2012 WSBT
    • 2013 WSBT
    • 2014 WSBT
    • 2015 WSBT
    • 2016 WSBT
    • 2017 WSBT
    • 2018 WSBT
    • 2019 WSBT
    • 2020 WSBT
    • 2021 WSBT
    • 2022 WSBT
    • 2023 WSBT
    • 2024 WSBT
    • 2025 WSBT
    • 2026 WSBT
  • WSOB
    • 1983 GSB
    • 1984 GSB
    • 1985 WSOB
    • 1986 WSOB
    • 1987 WSOB
    • 1988 WSOB
    • 1989 WSOB
    • 1990 WSOB
    • 1991 WSOB
    • 1992 WSOB
    • 1993 WSOB
    • 1994 WSOB
    • 1995 WSOB
    • 1996 WSOB
    • 1997 WSOB
    • 1998 WSOB
    • 1999 WSOB
    • 2000 WSOB
    • 2001 WSOB
    • 2002 WSOB
    • 2003 WSOB
    • 2004 WSOB
    • 2005 WSOB
    • 2006 WSOB
    • 2007 WSOB
    • 2008 WSOB
    • 2009 WSOB
    • 2010 WSOB
    • 2011 WSOB
    • 2012 WSOB
    • 2013 WSOB
    • 2014 WSOB
    • 2015 WSOB
    • 2016 WSOB
    • 2017 WSOB
    • 2018 WSOB
    • 2019 WSOB
    • 2020 WSOB
    • 2021 WSOB
    • 2022 WSOB
    • 2023 WSOB
    • 2024 WSOB
    • 2025 WSOB
    • 2026 WSOB

We’re looking for the following WSBT and WSOB Minutes:

WSBT Quarterly Missing Minutes

2003 – Feb. 2

WSOB Missing Minutes

1983 – Jan. – April, May, June, Aug. 16, Sept. – Oct.
1984 – Sept. 27, Oct, Nov
1985 – Jan. 16 – May 23
1985 – July 25 (missing page 2)
1988 – June 9
1990 – Jan. 18, July, Aug, Sept, Oct.
1992 – May 14, June 24 (missing page 3?)
1993 – Jan. 28, Feb. 25, Apr. 8, April 22, June, July, Aug. 26, Sept., Oct. 14, Nov. 11.
1995 Dec. 14 (missing page 4)
2005 – Nov.
2018 – May

Use this digital repository site for the most up-to-date a reliable history of Cocaine Anonymous. This site is hosted by the C.A. Service Sponsorship Group, which is a member of the C.A. Online Recovery Area and curated by Cocaine Anonymous Archivist, Cameron F. who has been involved in collecting, preserving, cataloguing and presenting the history of Cocaine Anonymous to the fellowship since 2009. Cameron F. is currently the C.A. Archivist and Secretary for C.A. World Archive Committee, Southern Ontario C.A. Area Archivist, Online International Area (formerly the OSA) Archivist and the Online Recovery Area Archivist.

The Archivist’s Serenity Prayer

“God, grant me the serenity to accept the collections I cannot decline… the courage to decline the collections I can… And the resources to process the backlog.”

Site Disclaimer

© 2026 C.A. DOCUMENTS Digital Library. Conference, WSBT and WSOB Minutes are C.A. documents, for members only. This usage to facilitate communication within the fellowship was approved by the 1990 WS Conference. Such confidential use does not , of course, violate in anyway out Tradition on anonymity in public communications media (press, radio, TV, etc).

© 2026 Cocaine Anonymous is a Fellowship of, by, and for addicts seeking recovery. Friends and Family of addicts should contact Co-Anon Family Groups, a Fellowship dedicated to their much different needs. Some of the items contained in these pages are published with permission of C.A. World Service, but this does not imply endorsement of this website by the C.A. World Service Conference or the C.A. World Service Office. The information provided within this website is intended to be a convenience for those who visit our website. Such inclusion does not constitute or imply endorsement by, or affiliation with, the Area or the Districts within. “Cocaine Anonymous World Service Conference Approved Literature. Copyright © 2026 Cocaine Anonymous World Service, “C.A.”, “Cocaine Anonymous” and the C.A. logo are registered trademarks of Cocaine Anonymous World Service. All rights reserved.” “In the spirit of Tradition Six, C.A. is not allied with any sect, denomination, politics, organization or institution. As such in the Area, District, Service Committees of Cocaine Anonymous and Cocaine Anonymous as a whole does not endorse and is not affiliated with or any of the companies and/or services offered on the site. Any links to external websites or services are only provided as a convenience to our members.”

C.A. Speaker Recordings: All members are free to interpret the recovery program in their own terms, but none can speak for the local Group or C.A. as a whole.
© 2026 Documents Archive for Cocaine Anonymous

I am a MEMBER of Cocaine Anonymous No, I'm NOT a Member of Cocaine Anonymous

Scroll Up